SWIF-T-FOOD MART v. ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
The Board granted petitioner’s motion for authorization of payment of attorney fees as costs of corrective action and directed that $11,291.37 in legal fees be reimbursed. The Board remanded the case to the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency to issue the requested reimbursement.
Section 57.8 of the Act addresses indemnification and what steps an
2owner or operator may take if the UST Fund lacks sufficient funds to reimburse for the activities.
Mot.
at 2. Swif-T attached the affidavit of
attorney Stephen F. Hedinger (Hedinger) documenting under oath the $11,291.37 of attorneyfees and costs being sought in this matter. The purpose of Title XVI includes administering and overseeing theUST Fund, as well as establishing requirements for eligible owners to seek reimbursement fromthe UST Fu...
Allowed
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
... 
