August 21, 1997DAYTON HUDSON CORPORATION,Complainant,v.
CARDINAL INDUSTRIES, INC., and
DANIEL E.
CARDINAL, JR.,
Respondents.
However, since the federal case between the parties involves different allegations than those
allegations in the complaint before the Board, the Board concludes that this matter is notduplicitous.
Comp.
at 2. The complaint alleges that Cardinal generated
hazardous substances in their painting, laminating, and gluing processes at the facility. Comp. at 5. As a result, Daytonordered its general contractor and subcontractors to cease any further construction. Comp. at8. Finally, Dayton requests that it receive its co...
Allowed
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
... 
