a variance from Section 9(a) of the Environmental ProtectionAct and Rule 802(b) of the Air Pollution Control Regulationsfor its Decatur rendering plant until August 15, 1974 forthe purpose of constructing a cover over its hotwell andevaluating the odor reduction effects of such cover.
This matter was originally docketed as a new variance
petition but upon reconsideration the Board chooses to considerit a motion ~uhsequent to entry of final order, The reason forthis is that the motion could be allowed without extending thevariance which was originally granted to August 15, 1974.
IT IS SO OR...
Allowed
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf