June 18, 1976ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,Complainant,v.
) PCB 75—494
PIELET BROS.
No attempt was made to secure an Agency
construction permit prior to initiating this work, and in Mayan Agency representative informed Respondent of a need for aconstruction permit for the installation of the equipment.
It is just this type of equipment which
accentuates the value of the construction and operating permitsystem.
Respondent was apprised of the operating permit requirement
in May of 1975, and began operating the facility onAugust 22, 1975.
Both the permit denial
appeal and the variance procedure could have provided Respondentwit...
Allowed
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
... 
