August 18, 1977ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,Complainant,v.
) PCB 76—57
DEAN PENN and WALTER DEEMIE,Respondents.
The Board notes that Respondents are not unfamiliar with
proceedings before this Board.
Although the answers were clearly defective, absent the
filing of a Motion to Strike which would have provided theanswering party a chance to remedy the defect, the Board isreluctant to, and shall not~ role that the answers be deemed asnot having been filed.
In order to prove a violation of the daily cover requirement,
it is necessary to establish that such cover was notapplied at the end of the working day.
EPA v. C. M. Ford,...
Allowed
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
... 
