February 20, 1985ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL ) PROTECTION AGENCY, )) Complainant,v.
) PCB 83-~23
ARNOLD~SSEWER AND SEPTIC ) SERVICE and JIMMY MCDONALD ) Respondent.
1002)
indicates that the principal reason for authorizing theimposition of civil penalties (par~l042~was to provid~ea methodto aid the enforcement of the Act and that the punitiveconsiderations were secondary~ (City of Monmouth v.
Pollution
Control Board (1974) 57 Ill.2d 482, 490, 313 N.E.
2d 161,
166), I find no reason to conclude that ...
Allowed
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf