January 8, 1987CITIZENS OF BURBANK,Complainants,v.
) PCB 84—124
OVERNITE TRUCKING, Respondents.
NOISE
The Board’s August 1, 1985, findings of noise emissionviolations were based on a public nuisance legal theory appliedto the citizen testimony in this proceeding.
The majority of the daytime
events only exceed the allowable levels forcertain frequencies.
Because the ETA
reports do not specify the amount of RPM reduction or the designmaterials for the noise barriers, these matters will be left toOvernite’s discretion.
In ETA’s
Report No. 1, the residents survey identified the odor as “oilyand smokey” and “a he...
Allowed
SykutaJ
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
... 
