This matter comes before the Board on a March 24, 1987Motion for Reconsideration filed by Respondent Continental GrainCompany (Continental) in response to the Board’s March 19, 1987Order denying Continental’s Motion to Dismiss.
Continental argues in its Reply that the significant
issue is not whether the McNeils counsel had notice of discoveryrequirements but whether the McNeils had personal notice thatcompliance with discovery was requi...
Allowed
scantmp6
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
... 
