ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
April 16,
1987
KENNETH MCNEIL
AND
LIBBY MCNEIL,
Complainants,
v.,
)
PCB 86—44
CONTINENTAL GRAIN COMPANY,
)
Respondent..
ORDER OF THE BOARD:
(by
J.D..
Dumelle):
This matter comes before
the Board
on
a March 24,
1987
Motion
for Reconsideration filed by Respondent Continental Grain
Company
(Continental)
in response to the Board’s March
19,
1987
Order denying Continental’s Motion
to Dismiss.
Continental
alleges that because the Complainants, Kenneth McNeil and Libby
McNeil (McNeils),
had personal notice that they were required to
respond
to discovery and because the McNeils failed
thereafter to
comply, the Motion
to Dismiss should have been granted..
On April
3,
1987, the McNeils filed with the Board their
Response to Motion for Reconsideration..
The McNeils alleged that
their new attorneys were unaware until March 23,
1987, that
a
response
to discovery was required, that materials in response to
discovery had been prepared, and that such materials would be
available
for production on or before April
10,
1987..
On April
10,
1987, the McNeil’s filed with the Board
their response
to
discovery..
On April
9,
1987, Continental filed with the Board
a Motion
for
Leave to File Reply to Response to Motion
for Reconsideration
Instanter..
The Motion for Leave to File Reply Instanter
is hereby
granted.
Continental argues
in its Reply that the significant
issue
is not whether the McNeils counsel had notice of discovery
requirements but whether the McNeils had personal notice that
compliance with discovery was required.
For the record,
the Board notes that the discovery process
has been plagued with delay..
Continental
began discovery in May
of 1986 and, finally,
on April
10,
1987, the McNeils responded.
In the interim, Continental served several
requests for
production on the McNeils’
former counsel,
and the Board granted
Continental’s Motion
to Compel on December
5,
1986.
In response
to Continental’s January 23,
1987 Motion
to Dismiss,
the Board,
on February 19,
1987 ordered the McNeils
to show cause as to why
77-153
—2—
the matter should not be dismissed,
The Board specifically
directed that
this Order be personally served on the McNeils.
The McNeils responded, by letter dated March 10,
1987 and filed
March 13,
1987,
that they had written to the Board
in December of
1986, advising that their former counsel had been replaced, that
any further correspondence should be directed to them,
and that
the only correspondence they had received was the Board’s recent
order, presumably the Order dated February 19,
1987..
The Board,
however, has no record of any letter sent by the McNeils
in or
around December of 1986.
Further,
the Board notes that the
Hearing Officer, on September 23,
1986, sent a letter
to the
McNeils enclosing
a copy of the September
19,
1986 Hearing
Officer Order requesting response
to the Interrogatories filed by
Continental..
Thus,
it would appear that the McNeils did have
notice that a response was
required..
Nothwithstanding
the
incidences aforementioned,
the McNeils
have demonstrated their desire
to adjudicate the allegations
contained
in their complaint by retaining other counsel and by
responding
to discovery..
As responses to discovery have been
filed,
the Board
finds that
it is
in the best interests of
justice and administrative convenience
to move forward,
The
Motion for Reconsideration
is therefore denied..
IT IS SO ORDERED..
I, Dorothy
M. Gunn, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
Board, hereby certify that the above Order was adopted on the
/~r~Z~
,
day of
__________________,
1987,
by
a vote of
Illionois Pollution Control Board
77-154