July 27, 1989ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTALPROTECTION AGENCY,Complainant,v.
) PCB 89—87
alsoMOLINE CORPORATION, an ) PCB 89-44Illinois Corporation,Respondent.
Nor did the Attorney General.
The
majority opinion completely glosses over this defect.
Section
101—305 —2—31(d) is written as explicitly as it is in part to provide anopportunity to the potential respondent to anticipate “up front”exactly what the Agency intends to file so as to prepare for themeeting, including the bringing of any experts, so as to avoidlitigation.
Finally, the Agency gives no explanation as to why it did
not cure the “31(d)” problem by sendin...
Allowed
scantmp3
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
... 
