July 9, 1992REICHHOLD CHEMICALS, INC., ) Petitioner, PCB 92—98vs.
The Agency reserves the right to change this
determination should additional informationbecome available which would modify thisdecision.
In Ideal Heating Company v.
IEPA, PCB91-253, January 23,
1992 , the Board interpreted the Act as providing for Boardreview of Agency UST determinations only after the Agency hadcompleted its two—step review process and made a finaldetermination as to the reimbursibility of costs.
(See Dissenting Opinions in Clinton County
Oil Co..
Inc., Hoffman/Meier’s Shell and Clarence Meier v.
Illinois Environmental Pr...
Allowed
scantmp1
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
... 
