Agency~srecommendation, which was that the $200,000 bond werequired posted be forfeited and that a hearing be held.
The first
stage was completed August 4, scarcely a month behind schedule;the second stage has not been delayed at all; it is not thecornpany~sfault the delay occurred.
We agree a~to the penalty, for
we see no point in requiring the money to be paid now if it mayhave to be repaid after judicial review.
in paragraph 3 of that order is hereby stayed pending judicial
review, on condition that a bond to secure payment of the penaltyin the event of an adverse judicial decision i...
Allowed
scantmp1
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf