Skip to Contents

DocuShare

Advanced
Location: Home  Contains  ...  Contains  2000 - 2006  Contains  2001  Contains  PCB Cases  Contains  Cases 01-101 through 01-150  Contains  PCB 01-104  Contains  PCB 01-104 08/23/01 Order Properties
Document

View Properties

PCB 01-104 08/23/01 Order
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS v. CITY OF WAUKEGAN, a municipal corporation
The Board denied complainant’s motion for summary judgment in Count III only with respect to 35 Ill. Adm. Code 306.305(c) of the Board’s regulations. The Board granted complainant’s motion for summary judgment with respect to Sections 12(a), 12(c), and 12(f) of the Environmental Protection Act (415 ILCS 5/12(a), 12(c), 12(f) (2000)) and 35 Ill. Adm. Code 304.141(b), 306.102(a), 306.304, 309.102(a) of the Board’s regulations.
Handle: Document-14393
Owner: Site Administrator (User-2, admin:DocuShare)DS
Thursday, September 6, 2001 03:11:43 PM CDT
Saturday, December 15, 2001 10:41:08 PM CST
Modified By: Site Administrator (User-2, admin:DocuShare)DS
Locked By:
  • ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
August 23, 2001PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS,Complainant,v.
  • CITY OF WAUKEGAN, a municipal
corporation,Respondent.
  • For the reasons outlined below, the Board denies complainant’s motion for summary
judgment in Count III only with respect to Section 306.305(c) of the Board’s regulations.
  • 2d 229, 240, 489 N.E.2d 867, 871
(1986).
  • However, a party opposing a motion for summary judgment may not rest on its
pleadings, but must “present a factual basis which would arguably entitle [it] to a judgment.”Gauthier v.
  • Westfall, 266 Ill. With both pumps failed, untreated sewage began to back up at the lift station. Mot. at 5.
STATUTORY FRAMEWORKIn th...
Allowed
wilsonb
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
01-104082301.pdf
4
91498
No
Appears In: PCB 01-104
Preferred Version: PCB 01-104 08/23/01 Order