C-5flA.,°t~C’ “SN isbCe~,n t.i RU - ~E F ~ ut en’r°~ree Brorr~r, parr s • qc.~an ~ ~ .t o t ant.ROcjtc~ s.
‘3a.
Several reasons are given for the inefficiency of the afterbarner:
1.
The afterburner is occasionally snuffed out.
In February 1974 Petitioner completed its “Statement of
Problem”.
In the event corrective action on the afterburner
fails to bring the operation into compliance, Petitioner proposesto investigate several alternatives by July 1, 1974 and implementthe alternative which provides the “most effective least cost”method of cOntrol. Therefore, in addition toattendant internal losses, Petitioner~s customers ...
Allowed
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
... 
