that "[t]he intended purpose of a motion for reconsideration is to bring to the court's attentionnewly discovered evidence which was not available at the time of hearing, changes in the laworerrors in the court's previous application ofthe existing law." Turlek v.
Village ofSummit
(July 21, 1994, PCB 94-19), citing Korogluyan v. Chicago Title & Trust Co., 213 Ill. FairmontMot. pp. 2-11.) 1. Right to Cross ExamineWith respect to Fairmont City's,argument regarding the right to cross examination, theBoard's Opinion .and Order makes clear that Fairmont City already ...
Allowed
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
... 
