June 5, 2014ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTALPROTECTION AGENCY,Complainant,v.
RUTH WHITE,
Respondent.
In this order, the Board denies respondent’s motion for
reconsideration and assesses the hearing costs along with the statutory civil penalty in thismatter.
Id.
at 2.
In addition, respondent states that she cannot afford
to pay a third party to clean the Site. 1992).The Board finds that respondent provided no new evidence or a change in the law thatwould indicate the Board’s April 3, 2014 decision finding respondent in violation of the Act wasin error. Respondent has not filed a response to either of these statements.
Allowed
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
... 
