December 20, 2012CHICAGO COKE COMPANY,Petitioner,v.
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AGENCY,Respondent,NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSECOUNCIL and SIERRA CLUB,Intervenors.
The Board first summarizes the motion to strike portions of IEPA’s motions for summary
judgment and IEPA’s response.
Mot.
IEPA at 1.
Chicago Coke notes that IEPA’s reason, set forth in the February 22,
2010 letter, for deciding that ERCs were unavailable is:That is, the Illinois EPA does not find that the ERCs claimed are available asoffsets, since it is our position that the Chicago Coke facility is permanentlyshutdown. 15,2009). Chicago Coke acknowledges that the Bo...
Allowed
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
... 
