PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, ) Complainant,vs.
I.
201(k) Issue
Counsel for PPI claims that Complainant failed to resolve discovery differences prior tofiling its Motion (Response pp.1-2).
This claim is simply ridiculous.
Complainant merely seeks straight answers to simple, but important, questions.
Detennination of the economic benefit of noncompliance from the
hypothetical non-operation of Press No.4 requires that all financial infonnation be considered. But PPI must also be2Electronic Filing - Received, Clerk's Office, 09/18/2012 directed to search records (including records that were "not requested ...
Allowed
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
... 
