October 21, 2010CHICAGO COKE COMPANY,Petitioner,v.
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AGENCY,Respondents.
seq.
(2008)) or Board regulations.
Resp.
at 2.
In ruling on a motion for reconsideration, the Board will consider factors including newevidence or a change in the law, to conclude that the Board’s decision was in error. 1992). The Board finds that the Agency has provided no new evidence or a change in thelaw that would indicate that the Board’s September 2, 2010 order accepting the petition forreview was in error.
Allowed
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf