February 4, 2010DICKERSON PETROLEUM, INC.,Petitioner,v.
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AGENCY,Respondent.
After Dickerson sought payment from the UST
Fund for costs associated with the same incident at the Site, the Agency determined that theincident was not subject to the UST provisions of the Environmental Protection Act (Act) or theBoard’s regulations.
This opinion then sets forth the relevant statutory and regulatory
provisions and the burden of proof and standard of review applicable to this case.
Also
on July 10, 2009, Dickerson filed a motion to consolidate the proceeding with PCB 09-87.
Thomas L. Herlacher, P.E., Principal En...
Allowed
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
PCB 09-87 Cons. 10-05 Opinion and Order 012110.pdf
... 
