December 17, 2009PRATHER OIL COMPANY,Petitioner,v.
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AGENCY,Respondent.
Adm.
Code 105.Subpart D.
In this case, the Agency rejected Prather’s request for
reimbursement from the UST Fund for the site.
Accordingly,
though the Board hearing affords petitioner the opportunity to challenge the Agency’s reasonsfor its decision, information developed after the Agency’s decision typically is not admitted athearing or considered by the Board. 2Hearings will be scheduled and completed in a timely manner, consistent with thedecision deadline (see 415 ILCS 5/40(a)(2) (2006)), which only Prather may extend by waiver...
Allowed
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf