December 3, 2009PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS,Complainant,v.
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY,
a Delaware corporation,Respondent.
20, 2009).
The essence of
UPRC’s argument was thatthe four counts in the People’s complaint improperly consolidate claims arisingfrom two “separate and unrelated” events in November 2005 and February 2006.
at 7.
The Board also stated that
“conducting two proceedings regarding alleged violations of the same NPDESPermit at the same facility by the same party would waste the resources of theBoard and the parties involved. 35 Ill. Adm.Code 101.902. The Board has stated that “the intended purpose of a motion fo...
Allowed
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
... 
