On February 5, 2009, an appearance of counsel was filed on behalf of Nokomis Quarry,
accompanied by the motion to dismiss (Mot.
Comp.
at 2-4. West requests
numerous forms of relief, including an order assessing a civil penalty and mandating thecessation of “processes” that allow “fugitive particles.” Id. at 5.West responds to the motion by suggesting that his complaint properly pled “the reliefsought” without “draw[ing] into question the Board’s authority.” Resp. Adm. Code 103.212(a). A complaint isduplicative if it is “identical or substantially similar to...
Allowed
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
... 
