April 2, 2009UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, a municipalcorporation,Complainant,v.
HAMMAN FARMS,
Respondent.
Hamman
may file an answer by July 6, 2009.
Recon.).
On December 11, 2008, Hamman filed a motion for leave to file a reply, attaching the
reply (Reply Recon.).
Hamman’s motion for leave to file, which Yorkville did not oppose, is
granted. HAMMAN’S MOTION TO RECONSIDERCount III of the complaint (“Air Pollution Violations”) was dismissed on October 16,2008. Mot. Recon. at 5. Yorkville responds that the Board correctlyapplied the law to count IV, adding that Yorkville “does not need to make a showing of 3‘unreasonable interference’ to e...
Allowed
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
... 
