February 5, 2009ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTALPROTECTION AGENCY,Complainant,v.
REYNOLDS SERVICE CO.,
Respondent.
11, 1993), we observed that “the intended purpose of a motion for reconsideration is
to bring to the court’s attention newly discovered evidence which was not available at the time ofhearing, changes in the law or errors in the court’s previous application of the existing law.”Korogluyan v.
Chicago Title & Trust Co., 213 Ill.
Therefore, the Board properly declined to consider the reply and nothing in respondent’s
motion for reconsideration convinces the Board otherwise.
(“Respondent”) is the presentownerand operatorof
a facility loca...
Allowed
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
Case Files 
