November 20, 2008KIBLER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATIONand MARION RIDGE LANDFILL, INC.,Petitioners,v.
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AGENCY,Respondent.
Kibler Development Corporation and Marion Ridge Landfill, Inc.
The respondent filed a response in opposition on
September 30, 2008.
11, 1993), we observed that “the intended purpose of a motion for reconsideration is
to bring to the court's attention newly discovered evidence which was not available at the time ofhearing, changes in the law or errors in the court’s previous application of the existing law.”Korogluyan v.
Chicago Title & Trust Co., 213 Ill. I, John T. Therriault, Assistant Cle...
Allowed
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
... 
