see Brief at 2. As the basis for its motion, Keller cites “newly discovered evidence, errors in theBoard’s previous application of existing law, and facts in the Record that the Board appears tohave overlooked.” Id. Id. at 36-40. Fourth, Keller arguesthat the Board’s opinion and order is not consistent with accepted principles of professionalgeology and therefore is not consistent with 35 Ill. Brief at 51. Keller further argues that it ...
Allowed
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf