On December 1, 2006, Halat filed a motion to vacate any possible default, to extend timeto respond to the complaint, and for leave to file a motion to dismiss. Stanhibel filed no response to the motion. Inan order dated March 1, 2007, the Board denied Halat’s motion to dismiss and also deniedHalat’s motion for judgment on the pleadings. Adm. Code900.102. The complaint claims that these alleged violations caused Stanhibel to experience aheadache and nervousness, prevented the complainant from enjoying th...
Allowed
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf