March 1, 2007LONE STAR INDUSTRIES, INC.,Petitioner,v.
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AGENCY,Respondent.
Also on January 29, 2007, Lone Star filed a motion to stay
the effectiveness of three contested permit conditions (Mot.).
In an order dated February 15, 2007, the Board accepted Lone Star’s petition for review
but reserved ruling on the motion for stay.
Id.
The Board’s procedural rules provide that a motion to stay a proceeding “must be
accompanied by sufficient information detailing why a stay is needed.” 35 Ill. at 1; Pet. at 3.Lone Star’s motion alleges that a stay of the contested permit conditions “is needed toprevent irrepara...
Allowed
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
... 
