December 21, 2006FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM,INC., Petitioner,v.
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AGENCY,Respondent.
The crux of both motions for summary judgment is the meaning of 35 Ill.
In this case, the record is clear that the respondent first submitted the corrective action
plan and the budget, and received approval from the Agency before beginning corrective action.
This matter should be remanded
to the Agency with instructions to consider whether the proposed budget amendment covers theactual costs of implementing the corrective action plan previously approved by Agency.
Allowed
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
... 
