PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, 1) Complainant, )) VS.
1 PCB No.
However, he is not an individual Respondent in Case No.
7.
As noted, Edward Pruim is not a party to this case.
In its Response to CLC's Motion, (Attached
without attachments as Exhibit D), the City states that 'the site is essentially closed',and that the'purpose of financial assurance provisions inthe Act have been squarely met'. The City'sclaims of 'substitute performance' in placeof financial assurance have been considered andrejected by the Board on several occasions.
Allowed
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
... 
