February 3, 2005PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS,Complainant,v.
PETCO PETROLEUM CORPORATION, an
Indiana corporation,Respondent.
Petco argued the Board should dismiss the People’s complaint for the following
reasons: (1) counts I, III, and V improperly combine separate causes of action by allegingviolations of Sections 12(a) and (d) in the same count; (2) a violation of Section 12(d) is a lesserincluded offense of Section 12(a); and (3) counts II, IV, and VI are duplicative of counts I, III,and V because they all allege violations of Section 12(a) of the Act.
Petco argues it suffered prejudice because the complaint lacked clarity and because
P...
Allowed
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
... 
