April 1, 2004PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS,Petitioner,v.
PINNACLE CORPORATION d/b/a
TOWN & COUNTRY HOMES,Respondent.
1972).
Further, respondent argues that any person
who files a complaint must plead with specificity the manner and extent of a purported violationand allegations which do not plead facts but state conclusions are insufficient.
at 2-3, citing People v.
Skokie Valley Asphalt,
PCB 96-98 (June 5, 2003). The People maintain that the complaint meets the contentrequirements of the Act and Board regulations and clearly advises respondent of the extent andnature of the alleged violations. Code 103.204(c) and People v. Bentronic...
Allowed
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
... 
