CLERK’S OFFICEBEFORE THE ILLiNOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD JAN 232004STATE OF ILLINOISMATE TECHNOLOGIES, iNC.
Dismissal is
proper only ifit is clear that no set offacts could be proven that would entitlecomplainant to relief See People v.
Peabody Coal Co., PCB 99-134, slip.
Counts I through VII’
Ignoring the language ofthe regulations involved in Counts I through VII, FTC baldlyasserts that the oil that FTC has wantonly spewn about must qualify as “waste.” But, theargument continues, the oil could not be waste until after FIC releases it, and after FTC ponderswhat to do with the stuff.
Code Parts 720 through 725, which impose
“cradle-to-grave” requirements o...
Allowed
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf