November 20, 2003VOGUE TYRE & RUBBER COMPANY,Petitioner,v.
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AGENCY,Respondent.
On November 3, 2003, Vogue Tyre and Rubber Company filed a response in opposition to
the motion to reconsider.
11, 1993), we observed that “the intended purpose of a motion for reconsideration is
to bring to the court's attention newly discovered evidence which was not available at the time ofhearing, changes in the law or errors in the court's previous application of the existing law.”Korogluyan v.
Chicago Title & Trust Co., 213 Ill.
Therefore, the motion to reconsider is denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Allowed
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
... 
