September 2, 1976CATERPILLAR TRACTOR CO., )) Petitioner,v.
) PCB 76—131
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, ) Respondent.
The statement in question
was, Caterpillar asserts that complianceschedules should not be necessary whenever:(a) There are no regulations with which tocomply (i.e., sulfur dioxide and particulateemission limitations)Both Caterpillar and the Agency responded to that InterimOrder on August 9, 1976.
The Agency disagrees, and is of the opinion that the
compliance plan requirement should be applied in this situation.
The submittal requirements of the permit system are
designed to allow assuran...
Allowed
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
... 
