View Properties

PCB 90-196 04/23/92 Forcade Concurring Opinion
HEICO INCORPORATED, v. ILLINOIS ENVIRONNENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,
Handle: Document-38654
Owner: Site Administrator (User-2, admin:DocuShare)DS
Monday, April 14, 2003 03:16:31 PM CDT
Monday, April 14, 2003 03:17:56 PM CDT
Modified By: Site Administrator (User-2, admin:DocuShare)DS
Locked By:
  • ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
April 23, 1992HEICO INCORPORATED, ) Petitioner, PCB 90—196v.
  • ) (Permit Appeal)
ILLINOIS ENVIRONNENTALPROTECTION AGENCY,Respondent.
  • On
April 9, 1992, one and one-half years later (531 days to beexact), the record contained no filings by the petitioner exceptcontinued waivers of the Board’s decision deadline.
  • The motion for reconsideration says, in essence — how dare
you force our case to hearingL The reconsideration motion statesthat the Board action “was improper” because it was not made inwriting or orally at hearing.
  • The parties appear to be arguing for due
process.
  • Bil SFox~cade
Board Member133—129 I,...
Allowed
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
OCR0003.pdf
4
259713
No
Appears In: PCB 90-196
Preferred Version: PCB 90-196 04/23/92 Forcade Concurring Opinion