against Fry for violations of the particulateemissions provisions of the Rules and RegulationsGoverning the Control of Air Pollution, for failure to file a Letter of Intent and Air Contaminant3—89 Emission Reduction Program as required by theRules and Regulations Governing the Control ofAir Pollution, Sections 2-2.3 and 2-2.4, andfor causing air pollution as defined within theEnvironmental Protection Act, Section 9.a.”On November 12, 1971, we received from respondent, Lloyd A.
...
Allowed
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
... 
