| PCB 71-243 09/26/72 Dumelle Dissent |
| ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY v. HARRY A. CARLSON |
| |
| |
|
Handle:
|
Document-38249
|
|
Owner:
|
Site Administrator (User-2, admin:DocuShare)DS
|
| Wednesday, April 2, 2003 02:43:48 PM CST |
| Thursday, April 10, 2003 08:45:57 AM CDT |
|
Modified By:
|
Site Administrator (User-2, admin:DocuShare)DS
|
| |
|
Locked By:
|
|
| - ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
September 26, 1972ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ))) v.)) HARRY A• CARLSON ) DISSENTING OPINION (by Mr.Like a couple of other witnesses prior, I have noticedthe obnoxious odors, for one thing.- The next element in assessing a large penalty is reasonable
competence.- yds.
- (computed from the dimensions on p. 1 as given in the
July 1972 “Impact Statement”hy Roy F. Weston, Inc. Since povertyhas not been pled in this case we can assume that it is notan issue. |
| Allowed |
| |
|
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
|
| OCR0001.pdf |
| |
| 4 |
| 592279 |
| |
| |
| No |
|
Appears In:
|
PCB 71-243
|
|
Preferred Version:
|
PCB 71-243 09/26/72 Dumelle Dissent
|
... 
