View Properties

PCB 72-349 12/05/72 Opinion
N. E. FINCH COMPANY v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Handle: Document-37853
Owner: Site Administrator (User-2, admin:DocuShare)DS
Wednesday, March 26, 2003 03:31:18 PM CST
Friday, May 2, 2003 01:52:14 PM CDT
Modified By: Site Administrator (User-2, admin:DocuShare)DS
Locked By:
  • ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
December 5, 1972N.
  • E.
  • FINCH COMPANY
#72-349v.
  • ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY )
WILSON C.
  • WASHKUHN, ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER
PRESCOTT E.
  • BLOOM, SPECIAL ASST. Petitioner alleges that the following factors make the use
of an air curtain destructor unreasonable:1. The topography of the area makes it virtually impossibleto use heavy equipment and attempts to use such equipment would endanger the safety of its construction crew;2. Further excavation would loosen the ground surface,encouraging erosion and release of particulate matter;3. Burning elsewhere would create more environmentalimpact...
Allowed
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
OCR0001.pdf
4
652218
No
Appears In: PCB 72-349
Preferred Version: PCB 72-349 12/05/72 Opinion