November 2~, 1972ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,Complainant,vs.
When the case was called for trial an EPA investigator testified
that he had observed smoke emissions from ~ s stack onJuly 20, 1970, January 5, 1971 and September 15.
The company had been bfowincj soot from its bOiler once during each
shift for a ten minute neriod.
There was testimony regarding the odor of fumes——usually chlorine
s~-’on a number of dotes since July 1, 1979, The EPA had alleged nine~necific dates when such omissions of odors had occurred and provedthat odors mere emitted.
We cannot find a nuisance in
mrocf that the odor of cilorine was simmi...
Allowed
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
... 
