May 3, 1973ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, ) Complainant,vs.
Respondent’s charge that the definitions of “refuse”,
“garbage”, “sanitary landfill” as found in Section 3 of the Actand the words ‘toperator’s own activities” contained in Section21(e) of said Act are vague, indefinite, uncertain, and violativeof due process of law is also found to be lacking in merit andis denied.
If Respondent sincerely felt his testimony would be self incriminating
in some criminal proceeding he should have pleaded theFifth 2~niendmentand refused to testify at the time he was calledas a witness.
Such conduct for the purpose of this
civil hearing does no...
Allowed
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
... 
