May 17, 1973ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,Complainant,v.
) PCJ3 73—29
INLAND METALS REFINING COMPANY,Respondent.
This Board finds that the Agency has presented no
evidence of Respondent’s alleged violations to this date andthat the public interest will best be served by a promptresolution of this matter under the terms of the settlementsuggested, and by avoidance of further costs and delays thatwill he incurred by a protracted hearing.
Bags which, upon visual
inspection, have failed will be replaced, up to and includingthe entire unit if necessary.
At any time during the calendar day at which stack emissions
indicate possible v...
Allowed
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
... 
