December 13, 1973ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCYCOMPLAINANT ) v.
) PCB 73—182
O’KEEFE BROS.
Because of the nature of the complaints, it is very necessary
to describe the area in which O’Keefe is located.
The motion to dismiss was denied by the Board,
and Respondent then filed an answer to complaint.
(Emission Standards #R—71—23 P.
25.)
The Complainant then finds himself in the position of having toprove not only that fugitive particles were emitted beyond Respondent’s property line, but also that at such a time the wind speed wasnot in excess of 25 mph. These times of these ...
Allowed
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
... 
