November 29, 1973FIELDS, GOLDMAN AND MAGEEPETITIONERSv.
) PCB 73—362
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCYRESPONDENTMR.
In PCB 73-219 the petition
was dismissed for a number of reasons.
Perhaps the most pertinent question which must be answered is:
Has Petitioner proven that it has fulfilled its statutory obligations under which it would be an acceptableparty to file a variance petition? The following line of questioningis a key factor in whether Fields, Goldman and Magee would itselfsuffer a hardship.
On the basis of the above Petitioner has clearly failed to comply
with the statutory requirements as to a show of hardshi...
Allowed
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
... 
