November 79, 1973ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ) vs.
Finally, the Complaint alleged that
the Respondent on the above cited eight dates unloaded refusewithout supervision, had insufficient equipment in operation atthe site to properly operate the landfill, failed to comply withthe daily spreading and compacting procedures, insufficientlycovered the refuse both as to depth and frequency, and permittedscavenging operations and deposition of refuse into standingwater, all in violation of Rules 5.04, 5.05, 5.06, 5.07 and 5.12(a) and (c) of the Rules and Regulations.
The Hearing was held on April 13, 19...
Allowed
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
... 
