| PCB 74-109 06/20/74 Opinion and Order |
| CAMEO DEVELOPMENT INC. v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY |
| |
| |
Handle:
|
Document-36276
|
Owner:
|
Site Administrator (User-2, admin:DocuShare)DS
|
| Wednesday, February 26, 2003 10:52:43 AM CST |
| Monday, May 12, 2003 12:11:20 PM CDT |
Modified By:
|
Site Administrator (User-2, admin:DocuShare)DS
|
| |
Locked By:
|
|
| - ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
June 20, 1974CAMEO DEVELOPMENT INC.- The hearing officer elected to allow
testimony in that no undue surprise was evident, and the station wasnot a major factcr in the waste load flow.- Mr.
- Coody received a letter (Exhibit A) dated November 16, 1973,
signed by a Mr.- The rationale for this ban along with interim steps being taken
by the city of Effingham weigh heavily in .~thiscase.- Again, there is no way to determine whether or not the plant
will indeed meet this criteria. |
| Allowed |
| |
|
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
|
| OCR0002.pdf |
| |
| 4 |
| 1473786 |
| |
| |
| No |
Appears In:
|
PCB 74-109
|
Preferred Version:
|
PCB 74-109 06/20/74 Opinion and Order
|