February 14, 1975CLEAN AIR COORDINATING COMMITTEE,Complainant,vs.
The Agency states that it requests reconsideration
“Not for the purpose of undoing the unfair and incredible publicitybarrage directed against it, but for the purpose of vindicatingitself as a hard-working, diligent, environmentally concernedAgency seeking to properly discharge its lawful obligations”.
At the outset we wish to say that we do not question the
diligence, the environmental concern and the motives of the Agency.
At noon on
that date the two hour average level for ozone did exceed theWatch standard of 0.07 ppm.
Coblenz’ testimony was
“completely candid and forth...
Allowed
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf