November 14, 1974CATERPILLAR TRACTOR COMPANY, ) Petitioner,vs.
The Agency contended that in an
opinion denying a variance the Agency should not be ordered toissue operating permits.
The Agency states that the intent of the Board’s Order
was to give Caterpillar a “reasonable” period of time, withoutthreat of prosecution for operating without permits, to re—evaluateits time schedule for installation of scrubbers and submit a revisedvariance petition to the Board.
Caterpillar should have used this time to evaluate the two
pilot systems and reach some kind of a corporate decision about14—418 —3—controls for the other three ...
Allowed
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
... 
