On March 10, 1975 the Environmental Protection Agency (Agency)
filed an Objection to the Petition for Variance and Motion for Hearing.
This denial, however, would be reached by the Board even in the absence
of an Agency Recommendation that the Variance be denied.
Nor may the Board here grant a Variance from Rule 205(f) of Chapter
2.
Even if the Board follows the Agency’s lead, and assumes that Petitioner
is seeking an extension of its Variance from Rule 205(f) as granted inthe earlier case, Petitioner presents us with insufficient facts uponwhich such an extension could be based, much less to meet the...
Allowed
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
... 
